Make

Visual workflow automation platform that connects 3,000+ apps, data sources and AI models into no-code automations and AI agents.

Workflow Automation # workflow automation# no-code# app integrations# AI agents# iPaaS
Make Screenshot 1

Quick Facts

Pricing Model

Freemium

Pricing Options

Monthly
$9 /mo
Get Started Now

Compensation may be received for transactions completed through affiliate partnerships.

Make Review: The Automation Heavyweight That Actually Respects Your Wallet

If you have outgrown Zapier's rigid linear paths and credit draining pricing, Make (formerly Integromat) is where you will likely land next. It is not a casual tool. It is an industrial grade workflow orchestrator built around a visual drag-and-drop canvas.

I have spent the last few weeks digging through community feedback, testing limitations, and looking closely at how it compares to the rest of the iPaaS market. Here is the reality: Make is powerful, but it does not coddle you.

The Visual Builder Is the Main Event

Most automation tools treat logic like a spreadsheet. Make treats it like a flowchart. The visual interface lets you drop in triggers, filters, and routers (which split your workflow into parallel paths) and physically drag connections between them.

When you are dealing with a simple trigger and action, the visual canvas feels like overkill. But when you need to handle complex branching logic, like routing leads based on their country code, filtering out free email domains, and conditionally updating Hubspot, the canvas becomes necessary. It is simply easier to debug something you can see.

The library itself is massive, sitting at over 3,000 pre-built app integrations. And if an app is not supported natively, the "Make Code App" module lets you run custom JavaScript or Python directly in the workflow. Recently, they also introduced Maia, an AI assistant that attempts to build automations from natural language prompts, as well as AI Agents for multi-step orchestration. The AI additions are neat, but the core visual engine remains the actual draw.

Where the Pricing Page Hides the Limits

Zapier charges you per task, which quickly becomes a nightmare when your volume scales. Make charges by credits. Every module action in a scenario, like fetching a row or sending an email, costs one credit.

The Free plan is remarkably generous on the surface. You get 1,000 credits per month with no time limit. But look closer, and there are two limits that bite hard: you are capped at a maximum of two active scenarios, and there is a 15-minute minimum interval between scheduled runs. If you need real-time data syncs, the Free tier is useless.

The moment you pull out a credit card, things get substantially better. The Core plan starts at $9 a month for 10,000 credits, drops the interval to one minute, and gives you unlimited scenarios. For comparison, 10,000 tasks on competing platforms will cost you significantly more.

If you are a solo founder or small agency, Core is probably all you need. The $16 a month Pro plan adds full text execution log search and priority queuing, while the $29 a month Teams plan adds role management. Custom functions and the on-premise agent are gated strictly behind the Enterprise tier.

What Real Users Say (The Learning Curve Is Brutal)

If you read through the automation subreddits, the consensus is clear: Make is cheaper and more capable than its main rival, but it requires a fundamentally different mindset.

A common Reddit complaint is that Make forces you to understand data structures. You are not just picking options from a dropdown; you often need to map arrays and understand JSON to get data moving correctly between apps. For non-technical users, this learning curve feels like hitting a brick wall. People frequently recommend using ChatGPT to troubleshoot specific module errors because the native documentation for niche integrations can be sparse.

For agency owners, Make is widely praised as a professional grade choice for building client facing tools. It sits right in the middle ground: more accessible than self-hosting n8n, but far more flexible than basic trigger-based tools.

The Verdict: Skip It If You Just Want Things Done Quickly

Pick Make if you have complex data transformation needs, want visual control over branching logic, and are tired of paying a premium for simple API calls.

Skip Make if you are terrified of the word "array" or just want an automation to work immediately without having to map fields manually. If your business depends on zero friction onboarding, paying a premium for simplicity is still the safer bet. But if you are willing to spend a weekend learning the tool, Make is simply the best value on the market right now.

Key Features

  • Visual drag-and-drop scenario builder
  • 3,000+ pre-built app integrations
  • Maia AI assistant that builds automations from natural language
  • AI agents that orchestrate multi-step workflows
  • Routers, filters and error handlers
  • Scheduled scenarios down to the minute on paid plans
  • Make API access
  • Templates library and Make Academy training
  • Teams, team roles and shared scenario templates
  • MCP server and on-prem agents

Pros

  • Free plan with no time limit and no credit card required
  • Visual builder makes complex branching logic approachable without code
  • Very large app library covering most mainstream SaaS
  • Backed by Celonis, with enterprise customers and active community support

Cons

  • Credit-metered pricing means cost scales with automation volume, not just seats
  • Free plan is capped at 1,000 credits/month with a 15-minute minimum interval between runs
  • Steeper learning curve than simple trigger-and-action tools
  • Advanced security, custom functions and 24/7 support are Enterprise-only

Technical Performance

Lighthouse Audit

Speed
53/100 D
Accessibility
89/100 B
Best Practices
92/100 A
SEO
92/100 A

Core Web Vitals

LCP 8.2s
FCP 1.9s
CLS 0.226
TBT 380ms
Speed Index 3.6s

Performance data measured via Google Lighthouse. Fast load times indicate a well-optimized product that won't slow down your workflow.

User Reviews

No reviews yet. Be the first to review this tool!

Tags

workflow automationno-codeapp integrationsAI agentsiPaaS